Skip navigation

no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Skip navigation
Goal: 25,000 Progress: 5,942
Sponsored by: Defenders of Wildlife

President Trump's crusade to build an impenetrable wall between the U.S. and Mexico could condemn wildlife already on the brink of extinction.

But Congress can put a stop to Trump's fixation. Federal legislators have the power to deny funding for this disastrous roadblock to the survival of imperiled species. Funding the wall would destroy wildlife habitat and could be the end of the road for imperiled species like endangered Mexican gray wolves, ocelots and jaguars.

We must act now! Demand that Congress refuse to fund the border wall.

Sign Here

Dear Senator/Representative:

I am writing to urge you to oppose funding for any additional border wall or for conversion of vehicle barriers to border wall along our southern border. Walls harm wildlife, public lands and the people who live, work and recreate in the borderlands.

A border wall or other physical barrier already extends across nearly 700 miles of the 1,933-mile U.S.-Mexico border. New barrier construction will further harm a diversity of wildlife and vast expanses of pristine landscapes and waterways, including essential wildlife migration corridors. And in many places, such as the Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuge, the wall would have significant economic and social impacts.

The innumerable short- and long-term consequences of border barriers on wildlife include direct mortality; reduced populations; blockage of migration routes and corridors; loss of food, water, and shelter; habitat fragmentation; exacerbation of flooding; and impacts to the conservation and recovery of threatened and endangered species. According to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, at least 89 endangered or threatened species and 108 migratory bird species could be affected by a wall and associated security activities along the border, including the Mexican gray wolf, jaguar, ocelot and Peninsular big horn sheep.

Some of the sensitive conservation lands along the U.S.-Mexico border are already lined with vehicle barriers - as opposed to pedestrian barriers - which prevent vehicle movement, but allow free passage for wildlife. Replacing vehicle barriers with pedestrian walls or fences would seal off these critical passages for wildlife like jaguar, ocelot, wolves, bison and bighorn sheep.

The proposed border wall could be constructed in and along many protected public lands and key habitats on the southern border. In the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas, the border wall would cut through the Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuge as well as the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge. Wall construction through the Santa Ana Refuge, for example, could cut off all public access and threaten its significant economic benefits to local communities. The refuge is the centerpiece of ecotourism in the Valley, which generates an estimated $463 million in sustainable economic activity for the region annually.

In New Mexico, the proposed wall would bisect crucial wildlife corridors in Hidalgo County as well as across the Chiricahua Mountains on the border with Arizona. In Arizona, the wall could bisect protected landscapes, including Buenos Aires and Cabeza Prieta national wildlife refuges, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, and essential habitat in the Coronado National Forest. In California, the border wall threatens conservation lands including the congressionally-designated Otay Mountain Wilderness, as well as a vital wildlife corridor crossing Bureau of Land Management lands in Jacumba.

As with existing barriers along the U.S.-Mexico border, additional construction can be exempted from all federal, state, or local laws by waivers under the under the REAL ID Act of 2005. The Bush administration used this authority five times and the Trump administration has already used it three times to waive more than 40 laws and federal safeguards, including the Endangered Species Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the Clean Air Act, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. The ability to invoke these waivers only guarantees the destructive impact of wall construction.

I urge you to take all possible steps to stop this unnecessary harm to the wildlife, wild places and communities along the border by opposing new funding for border wall construction in any legislative vehicle.


Petition Signatures

Feb 21, 2018 Brett Dennison
Feb 21, 2018 Zoe Quinn
Feb 21, 2018 Mary Whitcomb
Feb 21, 2018 Montse Colom
Feb 21, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Feb 21, 2018 Gabriela Gurdziel
Feb 21, 2018 Jill Gaughan
Feb 21, 2018 Diane Brown
Feb 21, 2018 Marci Robinson
Feb 21, 2018 Desiree Wallace
Feb 21, 2018 Gilbert Cardot
Feb 21, 2018 Angela Kohnke
Feb 21, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Feb 21, 2018 Franca Faustini
Feb 21, 2018 David McAlaster
Feb 21, 2018 Maggie Alk
Feb 21, 2018 Cathy Echlin
Feb 21, 2018 Renee Yaeger
Feb 21, 2018 Amy Wood
Feb 21, 2018 Joyce Papp
Feb 21, 2018 donovan israel
Feb 21, 2018 Julia Thielert
Feb 21, 2018 Olga Culebras
Feb 21, 2018 Sylvie Salade
Feb 21, 2018 Nancy Copeland
Feb 21, 2018 paul dormer
Feb 21, 2018 Bushra Qureshi
Feb 21, 2018 Mai Hermann
Feb 21, 2018 Jackie Paul
Feb 21, 2018 LAMOTHE HERVE
Feb 21, 2018 Pamela Davelis
Feb 21, 2018 Amy Peichert
Feb 21, 2018 Alison Bullock
Feb 21, 2018 Paula Santos
Feb 21, 2018 Elbert Peacock
Feb 21, 2018 Connie Okragleski
Feb 21, 2018 Michael Wichman
Feb 21, 2018 bruce hall
Feb 21, 2018 Kathrin Küspert
Feb 21, 2018 Amy Biggs
Feb 21, 2018 cinzia caporali
Feb 21, 2018 Sławomir Prucnal
Feb 21, 2018 Georgikopoulou vasiliki
Feb 21, 2018 Cindy Perilstein
Feb 21, 2018 elena Gazzotti
Feb 21, 2018 Gail Hyde
Feb 21, 2018 Asfa Aman
Feb 21, 2018 Virginia Wilson
Feb 21, 2018 Piotr Grabowski
Feb 21, 2018 tom rooze

back to top

Outerwear Brrr-gains
Mason Jar Solar Light
Share this page and help protect habitat: